On Sat, Apr 7, 2018 at 11:26 AM, David Rowley <david.row...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > Everything else looks fine from my point of view.
Me too, although I still think having struct names PartitionPruning and PartitionRelPruning is going to be a bit confusing. We should think about naming the latter to something else. I suggested PartitionPruningDispatch(Data), but David doesn't seem to like it. Maybe, PartitionPruneState, because it parallels the PartitionPruneInfo that comes from the planner for every partitioned table in the tree. Thanks, Amit
