Hi, On 2018-04-07 10:14:49 +0200, Michael Banck wrote: > Can the pg_verify_checksums command be kept at least, please? > > AFAICT this one is not contentious, the code is isolated, it's really > useful, orthogonal to online checksum activation and argueably could've > been committed as a separate patch anyway.
I've not looked at it in any meaningful amount of detail, but it does seem a lot lower risk from here. Greetings, Andres Freund
