Tom Lane writes: > Alvaro Herrera <alvhe...@alvh.no-ip.org> writes: >> Andreas Seltenreich wrote: >>> as of 039eb6e92f: >>> TRAP: FailedAssertion("!(subpath->parallel_safe)", File: "pathnode.c", >>> Line: 1813) > >> Uh, that's pretty strange -- that patch did not touch the planner at >> all, and the relcache.c changes are pretty trivial. > > I don't think Andreas meant that the bug is necessarily new in 039eb6e92f, > only that that's the version he happened to be testing.
Right. I'm not testing often enough yet to be able to report on commit granularity :-). I'll try for a less ambiguos wording in future reports.