On Fri, 8 Apr 2022, 14:36 Robert Haas, <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 6, 2022 at 8:15 AM Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Tue, Apr 5, 2022 at 8:43 PM Thom Brown <t...@linux.com> wrote: > > > I share your discomfort with the wording. How about: > > > > > > WAL records must be kept on standby until they are ready to be applied. > > > Therefore, longer delays will result in a greater accumulation of WAL > files, > > > increasing disk space requirements for the standby's > <filename>pg_wal</> > > > directory. > > > > Looks awesome. > > Here that is in patch form. I feel that the feature freeze should not > preclude committing this documentation improvement, but if someone > feels otherwise, then I will leave this until the tree reopens. > Thanks. This doesn't include my self-correction: s/kept on standby/kept on the standby/ Thom >
