Hi, On 2022-04-16 14:42:39 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > In the meantime, since it's clear that HaveRegisteredOrActiveSnapshot > is failing to meet its contract, I'm going to go fix it.
+1 > I think (based on the above argument) that what it intends to enforce > is not really the system design we need, but it certainly isn't > helping anyone that it enforces that design incorrectly. I think it's approximately right for the current caller. But that caller likely needs an improved design around snapshots... Greetings, Andres Freund
