On Thu, May 5, 2022 at 2:41 PM Alvaro Herrera <alvhe...@alvh.no-ip.org> wrote: > > On 2022-May-04, vignesh C wrote: > > > On Mon, May 2, 2022 at 5:49 AM Peter Smith <smithpb2...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > 1. Commit message > > > > > > In another thread using the terminology "multi-master" seems to be > > > causing some problems. Maybe you should choose different wording in > > > this commit message to avoid having the same problems? > > > > I felt, we can leave this to committer > > Please don't. See > https://postgr.es/m/20200615182235.x7lch5n6kcjq4...@alap3.anarazel.de
In this thread changing multimaster to multi-source did not get agreed and the changes did not get committed. The code still uses multimaster as in [1]. I think we should keep it as "multimaster" as that is already being used in [1]. [1] - https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/different-replication-solutions.html Regards, Vignesh
