On Mon, May 9, 2022 at 3:47 PM Amit Kapila <amit.kapil...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Fri, May 6, 2022 at 12:42 PM wangw.f...@fujitsu.com > <wangw.f...@fujitsu.com> wrote: > > > > On Fri, May 6, 2022 at 9:54 AM Masahiko Sawada <sawada.m...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > On Wed, May 4, 2022 at 7:18 PM Amit Kapila <amit.kapil...@gmail.com> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > On Mon, May 2, 2022 at 8:07 AM Masahiko Sawada <sawada.m...@gmail.com> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, May 2, 2022 at 11:32 AM Amit Kapila <amit.kapil...@gmail.com> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > So, shall we go back to the previous approach of using a separate > > > > > > function update_replication_progress? > > > > > > > > > > Ok, agreed. > > > > > > > > > > > > > Attached, please find the updated patch accordingly. Currently, I have > > > > prepared it for HEAD, if you don't see any problem with this, we can > > > > prepare the back-branch patches based on this. > > > > > > Thank you for updating the patch. Looks good to me. > > Thanks for your review. > > > > Improve the back-branch patches according to the discussion. > > >
The patches look good to me too. Regards, -- Masahiko Sawada EDB: https://www.enterprisedb.com/
