On Fri, May 27, 2022 at 11:59 AM Andres Freund <and...@anarazel.de> wrote: > On 2022-05-27 11:48:45 -0700, Peter Geoghegan wrote: > > I find it hard to believe that there wasn't even a cursory effort at > > performance validation before this was committed, but that's what it > > looks like. > > Yea. Imo this pretty clearly should be reverted. It has correctness issues, > testing issues and we don't know whether it does anything useful.
It should definitely be reverted. -- Peter Geoghegan
