On Sat, 9 Jul 2022 at 12:24, Zhihong Yu <z...@yugabyte.com> wrote: > > It seems the code would be more readable if you keep the assignment in else > block below: > > + else if (rte->rtekind == RTE_SUBQUERY || > + rte->rtekind == RTE_VALUES) > continue; > - rtename = rte->join_using_alias->aliasname; > } > - else > - rtename = rte->eref->aliasname; > > because rtename would be assigned in the `rte->rtekind == RTE_JOIN` case. >
But then it would need 2 else blocks, one inside the rte->alias == NULL block, for when rtekind is not RTE_JOIN, RTE_SUBQUERY or RTE_VALUES, and another after the block, for when rte->alias != NULL. I find it more readable this way. Regards, Dean
