On Saturday, July 23, 2022 6:58 PM Michael Paquier <mich...@paquier.xyz> wrote:
> 
> On Sat, Jul 23, 2022 at 05:44:28PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> > Changing get_altertable_subcmdtypes() to return a set of rows made of
> > (subcommand, object description) is what I actually meant upthread as
> > it feels natural given a CollectedCommand in input, and as
> > pg_event_trigger_ddl_commands() only gives access to a set of
> > CollectedCommands.  This is also a test module so there is no issue in
> > changing the existing function definitions.
> >
> > But your point would be to have a new function that takes in input a
> > CollectedATSubcmd, returning back the object address or its
> > description?  How would you make sure that a subcommand maps to a
> > correct object address?
> 
> FWIW, I was thinking about something among the lines of 0002 on top of Hou's
> patch.

Thanks for the patches. The patches look good to me.

BTW, while reviewing it, I found there are some more subcommands that the
get_altertable_subcmdtypes() doesn't handle(e.g., ADD/DROP/SET IDENTITY and re 
ADD
STAT). Shall we fix them all while on it ?

Attach a minor patch to fix those which is based on the v2 patch set.

Best regards,
Hou zj


Attachment: v2-0003-Add-support-for-some-missed-commands-in-test_ddl_dep_patch
Description: v2-0003-Add-support-for-some-missed-commands-in-test_ddl_dep_patch

Reply via email to