On Sun, Jul 24, 2022 1:28 AM vignesh C <vignes...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Added a  note for the same and referred it to the conflicts section.
> 
> Thanks for the comments, the attached v38 patch has the changes for the same.

Thanks for your patches.

Two slight comments on the below message in the 0001 patch:

The error message in the function check_pub_table_subscribed().
+               ereport(ERROR,
+                               
errcode(ERRCODE_OBJECT_NOT_IN_PREREQUISITE_STATE),
+                               errmsg("could not replicate table \"%s.%s\"",
+                                          nspname, relname),
+                               errdetail("CREATE/ALTER SUBSCRIPTION with 
origin = none and copy_data = on is not allowed when the publisher has 
subscribed same table."),
+                               errhint("Use CREATE/ALTER SUBSCRIPTION with 
copy_data = off/force."));

1.
I think it might be better to use true/false here than on/off.
Just for consistency with another error message
(in function parse_subscription_options) and the description of this parameter
in the PG document.

If you agree with this, please also kindly consider the attached
"slight_modification.diff" file.
(This is a slight modification for the second patch, just replace "off" with
"false" in PG document.)

2.
How about replacing "origin = none" and "copy_data = on" in the message with
"%s"? I think this might be better for translation. Just like the following
error message in the function parse_subscription_options:
```
                if (opts->copy_data &&
                        IsSet(opts->specified_opts, SUBOPT_COPY_DATA))
                        ereport(ERROR,
                                        (errcode(ERRCODE_SYNTAX_ERROR),
                                         errmsg("%s and %s are mutually 
exclusive options",
                                                        "connect = false", 
"copy_data = true/force")));
```

Regards,
Wang wei

Attachment: slight_modification.diff
Description: slight_modification.diff

Reply via email to