On 2022-Jul-29, Kyotaro Horiguchi wrote: > At Fri, 29 Jul 2022 11:27:01 +1200, Thomas Munro <thomas.mu...@gmail.com> > wrote in > > Maybe it just needs a replication slot? I see: > > > > ERROR: requested WAL segment 000000010000000000000003 has already been > > removed > > Agreed, I see the same. The same failure can be surely reproducible > by inserting wal-switch+checkpoint after taking backup [1]. And it is > fixed by the attached.
WFM, pushed that way. I added a slot drop after the pg_stat_replication count check to be a little less intrusive. Thanks Matthias for reporting. (Note that the Cirrus page has a download link for the complete logs as artifacts). -- Álvaro Herrera 48°01'N 7°57'E — https://www.EnterpriseDB.com/ "I'm always right, but sometimes I'm more right than other times." (Linus Torvalds)
