Peter Eisentraut <[email protected]> writes: > More portability cruft cleanup: Our own definition of offsetof() was > only relevant for ancient systems and can surely be removed.
+1, it's required by C99.
regards, tom lane
Peter Eisentraut <[email protected]> writes: > More portability cruft cleanup: Our own definition of offsetof() was > only relevant for ancient systems and can surely be removed.
+1, it's required by C99.
regards, tom lane