On Tue, 30 Aug 2022 at 03:43, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > I think adding a padding field to SlabBlock would be a less messy > solution than your patch.
Thank you both of you for looking at this while I was sleeping. I've read over the emails and glanced at Tomas' patch. I think that seems good. I think I'd rather see us do that than pad the struct out further as Tomas' method is more aligned to what we do in aset.c (ALLOC_BLOCKHDRSZ) and generation.c (Generation_BLOCKHDRSZ). I can adjust Tomas' patch to #define Slab_BLOCKHDRSZ David
