Japin Li <japi...@hotmail.com> writes:
> On Fri, 09 Sep 2022 at 23:34, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> I don't like this particularly --- it puts way too much premium on
>> the happenstance that the MakeExpandedObjectReadOnly call is the
>> very last step in the callback function. If that needed to change,
>> we'd have a mess.
> Sorry, I don't get your mind. Could you explain it more? Thanks in advance!
This refactoring cannot support the situation where there is more
code to execute after MakeExpandedObjectReadOnly.
regards, tom lane
