Masahiko Sawada <sawada.m...@gmail.com> writes: > On Fri, Sep 9, 2022 at 11:31 PM Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: >> Recently a number of buildfarm animals have failed at the same >> place in src/test/subscription/t/100_bugs.pl [1][2][3][4]: >> >> # Failed test '2x3000 rows in t' >> # at t/100_bugs.pl line 149. >> # got: '9000' >> # expected: '6000' >> # Looks like you failed 1 test of 7. >> [09:30:56] t/100_bugs.pl ...................... >> >> This was the last commit to touch that test script. I'm thinking >> maybe it wasn't adjusted quite correctly? On the other hand, since >> I can't find any similar failures before the last 48 hours, maybe >> there is some other more-recent commit to blame. Anyway, something >> is wrong there.
> It seems that this commit is innocent as it changed only how to wait. Yeah. I was wondering if it caused us to fail to wait somewhere, but I concur that's not all that likely. > It's likely that the commit f6c5edb8abcac04eb3eac6da356e59d399b2bcef > is relevant. Noting that the errors have only appeared in the past couple of days, I'm now suspicious of adb466150b44d1eaf43a2d22f58ff4c545a0ed3f (Fix recovery_prefetch with low maintenance_io_concurrency). regards, tom lane