2022-09-16 17:30 に Kyotaro Horiguchi さんは書きました:
At Fri, 16 Sep 2022 15:55:33 +0900, bt22nakamorit
<bt22nakamo...@oss.nttdata.com> wrote in
Hi,
"""\set ON_ERROR_STOP on""" stops any subsequent incoming query that
comes after an error of an SQL, but does not stop after a shell script
ran by """\! <some command>""" returning values other than 0, -1, or
127, which suggests a failure in the result of the shell script.
For example, suppose that below is an SQL file.
\set ON_ERROR_STOP on
SELECT 1;
\! false
SELECT 2;
The current design allows SELECT 2 even though the shell script
returns a value indicating a failure.
Since the "false" command did not "error out"?
I thought that this action is rather unexpected since, based on the
word """ON_ERROR_STOP""", ones may expect that failures of shell
scripts should halt the incoming instructions as well.
One clear solution is to let failures of shell script stop incoming
queries just like how errors of SQLs do currently. Thoughts?
I'm not sure we want to regard any exit status from a succssful run as
a failure.
On the other hand, the proposed behavior seems useful to me.
So +1 from me to the proposal, assuming the corresponding edit of the
documentation happens.
regards.
Since the "false" command did not "error out"?
"false" command returns 1 which is an exit status code that indicates
failure, but not error.
I think it does not "error out" if that is what you mean.
So +1 from me to the proposal, assuming the corresponding edit of the
documentation happens.
I will work on editing the document and share further updates.
Thank you!
Tatsu
