On Wed, 21 Sept 2022 at 02:32, David Rowley <dgrowle...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Tue, 2 Aug 2022 at 03:37, Simon Riggs <simon.ri...@enterprisedb.com> wrote: > > Using the above test case, I'm getting a further 4-7% improvement on > > already committed code with the attached patch, which follows your > > proposal. > > > > The patch passes info via a state object, useful to avoid API churn in > > later patches. > > Hi Simon, > > I took this patch for a spin and saw a 2.5% performance increase using > the random INT test that Tom posted. The index took an average of > 7227.47 milliseconds on master and 7045.05 with the patch applied.
Hi David, Thanks for tests and review. I'm just jumping on a plane, so may not respond in detail until next Mon. -- Simon Riggs http://www.EnterpriseDB.com/
