At Thu, 29 Sep 2022 12:35:04 +0900 (JST), Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota....@gmail.com> wrote in > > Thank you for the feedback! > > I agree that the messages should be more clear. > > \\!: command was not executed > > \\!: command failed > > Would these two messages be enough to describe the two cases? > > FWIW, I would spell these as something like this: > > > \\!: command execution failure: %m
The following might be more complient to our policy. > \\!: failed to execute command \"%s\": %m > > \\!: command returned failure status: %d regards. -- Kyotaro Horiguchi NTT Open Source Software Center
