Nathan Bossart <nathandboss...@gmail.com> writes:
> On Thu, Oct 13, 2022 at 03:25:27PM +0530, Bharath Rupireddy wrote:
>> The intent here looks reasonable to me. However, why should the user
>> be able to set both archive_command and archive_library in the first
>> place only to later fail in LoadArchiveLibrary() per the patch? IMO,
>> the check_hook() is the right way to disallow any sorts of GUC
>> misconfigurations, no?
> There was some discussion upthread about using the GUC hooks to enforce
> this [0]. In general, it doesn't seem to be a recommended practice.
Yeah, it really does not work to use GUC hooks to enforce multi-variable
constraints. We've learned that the hard way (more than once, if memory
serves).
regards, tom lane
