On Tue, Nov 8, 2022 at 9:20 PM Bharath Rupireddy
<bharath.rupireddyforpostg...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Thanks. Do we need a similar wakeup approach for logical replication
> workers in worker.c? Or is it okay that the nap time is 1sec there?

Yeah, I think so.  At least for its idle/nap case (waiting for flush
is also a technically interesting case, but harder, and applies to
non-idle systems so the polling is a little less offensive).


Reply via email to