On Tue, Nov 08, 2022 at 09:45:40PM +1300, Thomas Munro wrote: > On Tue, Nov 8, 2022 at 9:20 PM Bharath Rupireddy > <bharath.rupireddyforpostg...@gmail.com> wrote: >> Thanks. Do we need a similar wakeup approach for logical replication >> workers in worker.c? Or is it okay that the nap time is 1sec there? > > Yeah, I think so. At least for its idle/nap case (waiting for flush > is also a technically interesting case, but harder, and applies to > non-idle systems so the polling is a little less offensive).
Bharath, are you planning to pick this up? If not, I can probably spend some time on it. -- Nathan Bossart Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com
