On Tue, 8 Nov 2022 at 03:10, Simon Riggs <simon.ri...@enterprisedb.com> wrote: > > On Mon, 7 Nov 2022 at 08:20, Simon Riggs <simon.ri...@enterprisedb.com> wrote: > > > Temp tables are actually easier, since we don't need any of the > > concurrency features we get with lazy vacuum.
> Thoughts? New patch, which does this, when in a xact block 1. For temp tables, only VACUUM FULL is allowed 2. For persistent tables, an AV task is created to perform the vacuum, which eventually performs a vacuum The patch works, but there are various aspects of the design that need input. Thoughts? -- Simon Riggs http://www.EnterpriseDB.com/
single_table_vacuum_in_xact.v3.patch
Description: Binary data
