On Mon, 14 Nov 2022 at 19:52, Simon Riggs <simon.ri...@enterprisedb.com> wrote: > > On Tue, 8 Nov 2022 at 03:10, Simon Riggs <simon.ri...@enterprisedb.com> wrote: > > > > On Mon, 7 Nov 2022 at 08:20, Simon Riggs <simon.ri...@enterprisedb.com> > > wrote: > > > > > Temp tables are actually easier, since we don't need any of the > > > concurrency features we get with lazy vacuum. > > > Thoughts? > > New patch, which does this, when in a xact block > > 1. For temp tables, only VACUUM FULL is allowed > 2. For persistent tables, an AV task is created to perform the vacuum, > which eventually performs a vacuum > > The patch works, but there are various aspects of the design that need > input. Thoughts?
New version. -- Simon Riggs http://www.EnterpriseDB.com/
single_table_vacuum_in_xact.v4.patch
Description: Binary data
