On Mon, Nov 21, 2022 at 2:10 AM Andres Freund <and...@anarazel.de> wrote: > On 2022-11-20 17:26:11 -0500, Robert Haas wrote: > > On Sun, Nov 20, 2022 at 3:43 PM Andres Freund <and...@anarazel.de> wrote: > > > I couldn't quite decide what wait_event_type to best group this under? In > > > the > > > attached patch I put it under timeouts, which doesn't seem awful. > > > > I think it would be best to make it its own category, like we do with > > buffer pins. > > I was wondering about that too - but decided against it because it would only > show a single wait event. And wouldn't really describe spinlocks as a whole, > just the "extreme" delays. If we wanted to report the spin waits more > granular, we'd presumably have to fit the wait events into the lwlock, buffers > and some new category where we name individual spinlocks.
+1 for making a group of individual names spin delays. ------ Regards, Alexander Korotkov
