Hi, On November 21, 2022 12:58:16 PM PST, Alexander Korotkov <aekorot...@gmail.com> wrote: >On Mon, Nov 21, 2022 at 2:10 AM Andres Freund <and...@anarazel.de> wrote: >> On 2022-11-20 17:26:11 -0500, Robert Haas wrote: >> > On Sun, Nov 20, 2022 at 3:43 PM Andres Freund <and...@anarazel.de> wrote: >> > > I couldn't quite decide what wait_event_type to best group this under? >> > > In the >> > > attached patch I put it under timeouts, which doesn't seem awful. >> > >> > I think it would be best to make it its own category, like we do with >> > buffer pins. >> >> I was wondering about that too - but decided against it because it would only >> show a single wait event. And wouldn't really describe spinlocks as a whole, >> just the "extreme" delays. If we wanted to report the spin waits more >> granular, we'd presumably have to fit the wait events into the lwlock, >> buffers >> and some new category where we name individual spinlocks. > >+1 for making a group of individual names spin delays.
Personally I'm not interested in doing that work, tbh. Andres -- Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
