Hi, I'll check that tomorrow. If it is so then there won't be a problem keeping old tables without re-toasting.
On Tue, Nov 29, 2022 at 1:10 AM Andres Freund <and...@anarazel.de> wrote: > Hi, > > On 2022-11-28 16:57:53 -0500, Tom Lane wrote: > > As I said before, I think there's a decent argument that some people > > will want the option to stay with 4-byte TOAST OIDs indefinitely, > > at least for smaller tables. > > I think we'll need to do something about the width of varatt_external to > make > the conversion to 64bit toast oids viable - and if we do, I don't think > there's a decent argument for staying with 4 byte toast OIDs. I think the > varatt_external equivalent would end up being smaller in just about all > cases. > And as you said earlier, the increased overhead inside the toast table / > index > is not relevant compared to the size of toasted datums. > > Greetings, > > Andres Freund > -- Regards, Nikita Malakhov Postgres Professional https://postgrespro.ru/
