Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> writes: > On Thu, Dec 1, 2022 at 2:41 PM Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: >> I'd be the first to agree that "ereturn" >> doesn't capture that detail very well, but I don't have a better name. >> (And I do like the fact that this name is the same length as "ereport", >> so that we won't end up with lots of reindentation to do.)
> I don't think it's sensible to make decisions about important syntax > on the basis of byte-length. Reindenting is a one-time effort; code > clarity will be with us forever. Sure, but without a proposal for a better name, that's irrelevant. regards, tom lane