"David G. Johnston" <david.g.johns...@gmail.com> writes:
> So long as you aren't opposed to the idea if someone else does the work,
> adding sect2 is better than nothing even if it is just a stop-gap measure.
OK, we can agree on that.
As for the other point --- not sure why I didn't remember this right off,
but the point of two test functions is that one exercises the code path
with details_wanted = true while the other exercises details_wanted =
false. A combined function would only test the first case.
regards, tom lane
