Thomas Munro <thomas.mu...@gmail.com> writes: > So I think we probably need something like the attached, which I was > originally trying to avoid.
Yeah, something like that. I also wonder if you don't need to think
a bit harder about the ordering of the flag checks, in particular
it seems like servicing reload_request before child_exit might be
a good idea (remembering that child_exit might cause launching of
new children, so we want to be up to speed on relevant settings).
regards, tom lane
