At Tue, 24 Jan 2023 11:45:36 +0530, Amit Kapila <amit.kapil...@gmail.com> wrote in > Personally, I would prefer the above LOGs to be in reverse order as it > doesn't make much sense to me to first say that we are skipping > changes and then say the transaction is delayed. What do you think?
In the first place, I misunderstood maybe_start_skipping_changes(), which doesn't actually skip changes. So... sorry for the noise. For the record, I agree that the current order is right. regards. -- Kyotaro Horiguchi NTT Open Source Software Center
