Hi Andres, > > So to clarify, are we talking about tuple-level compression? Or > > perhaps page-level compression? > > Tuple level.
> although my own patch proposed attribute-level compression, not > tuple-level one, it is arguably closer to tuple-level approach than > page-level one Just wanted to make sure that by tuple-level we mean the same thing. When saying tuple-level do you mean that the entire tuple should be compressed as one large binary (i.e. similarly to page-level compression but more granularly), or every single attribute should be compressed separately (similarly to how TOAST does this)? -- Best regards, Aleksander Alekseev
