On 9 May 2018 at 17:33, Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, May 9, 2018 at 11:20 AM, Simon Riggs <si...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: >> On 9 May 2018 at 16:15, Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> On Wed, May 9, 2018 at 11:14 AM, Simon Riggs <si...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: >>>> On 9 May 2018 at 16:10, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: >>>>> Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> writes: >>>>>> On Wed, May 9, 2018 at 9:08 AM, Simon Riggs <si...@2ndquadrant.com> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> Shouldn't the fix be to allow creation of indexes on foreign tables? >>>>>>> (Maybe they would be virtual or foreign indexes??) >>>>> >>>>>> It might be useful to invent the concept of a foreign index, but not >>>>>> for v11 a month after feature freeze. >>>>> >>>>> Yeah. That's a can of worms we can *not* open at this stage. >>>> >>>> Lucky nobody suggested that then, eh? Robert's just making a joke. >>> >>> Someone did suggest that. It was you. >> >> Oh, you weren't joking. I think we're having serious problems with >> people putting words in my mouth again then. >> >> Please show me where I suggested doing anything for v11? > > Come on, Simon. It's in the quoted text.
No, its not. > I realize you didn't say > v11 specifically, but this is the context of a patch that is proposed > a bug-fix for v11. If you meant that we should apply the patch as > proposed now, or some other one, and do the other thing later, you > could have said so. I think its reasonable to expect you interpret my words sensibly, rather than in some more dramatic form where I seem to break rules with every phrase. -- Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services