Dean Rasheed <[email protected]> writes: > On 15 May 2018 at 22:55, Tom Lane <[email protected]> wrote: >> Here's a proposed patch for that.
> In the case 1 ^ NaN = 1, what should the result scale be?
The result is exact, so I don't see a reason to be worried about its
scale. Messing with the scale would also require expending even
more code on what is, in the end, a corner case that no users have
expressed concern about.
regards, tom lane
