On Tue, Apr 11, 2023 at 11:50 PM Andres Freund <and...@anarazel.de> wrote: > > On 2023-04-11 11:33:01 -0500, Justin Pryzby wrote: > > On Wed, Mar 22, 2023 at 10:00:48AM -0700, Andres Freund wrote: > > > I don't know whether others think we should apply it this release, given > > > the > > > "late submission", but I tend to think it's not worth caring the > > > complication > > > of vacuum_defer_cleanup_age forward. > > > > I don't see any utility in waiting; it just makes the process of > > removing it take longer for no reason. > > > > As long as it's done before the betas, it seems completely reasonable to > > remove it for v16. > > Added the RMT. > > We really should have a rmt@pg.o alias... > > Updated patch attached. I think we should either apply something like that > patch, or at least add a <warning/> to the docs. >
+1 to do one of the above. I think there is a good chance that somebody might be doing more harm by using it so removing this shouldn't be a problem. Personally, I have not heard of people using it but OTOH it is difficult to predict so giving some time is also not a bad idea. Do others have any opinion/suggestion on this matter? -- With Regards, Amit Kapila.
