On Thu, 2023-04-13 at 12:16 -0400, Jonathan S. Katz wrote: > On 4/13/23 11:32 AM, Jonathan S. Katz wrote: > > On 4/12/23 11:34 PM, Amit Kapila wrote: > > > On Tue, Apr 11, 2023 at 11:50 PM Andres Freund <and...@anarazel.de> > > > > +1 to do one of the above. I think there is a good chance that > > > somebody might be doing more harm by using it so removing this > > > shouldn't be a problem. Personally, I have not heard of people using > > > it but OTOH it is difficult to predict so giving some time is also not > > > a bad idea. > > > > > > Do others have any opinion/suggestion on this matter? > > > > I need a bit more time to study this before formulating an opinion on > > whether we should remove it for v16. In any case, I'm not against > > documentation. > > [RMT hat] > > +1 for removing.
I am not against this in principle, but I know that there are people using this parameter; see the discussion linked in https://postgr.es/m/e1jkzxe-0006dw...@gemulon.postgresql.org I can't say if they have a good use case for that parameter or not. Yours, Laurenz Albe
