Hi, On 2023-04-19 12:16:24 -0500, Justin Pryzby wrote: > On Wed, Apr 19, 2023 at 11:17:04AM -0400, Melanie Plageman wrote: > > Ultimately this is probably fine. If we wanted to modify one of the > > existing tests to cover the multi-batch case, changing the select > > count(*) to a select * would do the trick. I imagine we wouldn't want to > > do this because of the excessive output this would produce. I wondered > > if there was a pattern in the tests for getting around this. > > You could use explain (ANALYZE). But the output is machine-dependant in > various ways (which is why the tests use "explain analyze so rarely).
I think with sufficient options it's not machine specific. We have a bunch of EXPLAIN (ANALYZE, COSTS OFF, SUMMARY OFF, TIMING OFF) .. in our tests. Greetings, Andres Freund
