On Fri, May 18, 2018 at 10:28:12AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> While we're all griping about omissions from the release notes ...
> I think you should have documented that we fixed plpgsql to cope
> (or cope better, at least) with intrasession changes in the rowtypes
> of composite-type variables. See bug #15203 for the latest in a long
> line of user complaints about that --- so it's not like this is
> something users don't care about.
It was fixed in this commit, right?
commit 4b93f57999a2ca9b9c9e573ea32ab1aeaa8bf496
Author: Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Date: Tue Feb 13 18:52:21 2018 -0500
Make plpgsql use its DTYPE_REC code paths for composite-type
variables.
Sure I can add it, once you confirm.
--
Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
+ As you are, so once was I. As I am, so you will be. +
+ Ancient Roman grave inscription +
