On Tue, May 22, 2018 at 11:31:08PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <[email protected]> writes:
> > On Fri, May 18, 2018 at 10:28:12AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> >> While we're all griping about omissions from the release notes ...
> >> I think you should have documented that we fixed plpgsql to cope
> >> (or cope better, at least) with intrasession changes in the rowtypes
> >> of composite-type variables.
>
> > It was fixed in this commit, right?
> > commit 4b93f57999a2ca9b9c9e573ea32ab1aeaa8bf496
>
> That was the main one, anyway.
OK, added. Applied patch attached.
--
Bruce Momjian <[email protected]> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
+ As you are, so once was I. As I am, so you will be. +
+ Ancient Roman grave inscription +
diff --git a/doc/src/sgml/release-11.sgml b/doc/src/sgml/release-11.sgml
new file mode 100644
index 05fd23f..7599c6f
*** a/doc/src/sgml/release-11.sgml
--- b/doc/src/sgml/release-11.sgml
*************** same commits as above
*** 1982,1987 ****
--- 1982,2004 ----
<listitem>
<!--
+ 2018-02-13 [4b93f5799] Make plpgsql use its DTYPE_REC code paths for
composite-
+
+ -->
+
+ <para>
+ Allow PL/pgSQL to handle changes to composite types (e.g. record,
+ row) that happen between the first and later function executions
+ in the same session (Tom Lane)
+ </para>
+
+ <para>
+ Previously such circumstances generated errors.
+ </para>
+ </listitem>
+
+ <listitem>
+ <!--
2018-03-28 [3f44e3db7] Transforms for jsonb to PL/Python
-->