On Wed, Jun 14, 2023 at 2:49 PM Etsuro Fujita <etsuro.fuj...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 5, 2023 at 10:19 PM Etsuro Fujita <etsuro.fuj...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > To avoid this issue, I am wondering if we should modify > > add_paths_to_joinrel() in back branches so that it just disallows the > > FDW to consider pushing down joins when the restrictlist has > > pseudoconstant clauses. Attached is a patch for that. > > I think that custom scans have the same issue, so I modified the patch > further so that it also disallows custom-scan providers to consider > join pushdown in add_paths_to_joinrel() if necessary. Attached is a > new version of the patch. Good point. The v2 patch looks good to me for back branches. I'm wondering what the plan is for HEAD. Should we also disallow foreign/custom join pushdown in the case that there is any pseudoconstant restriction clause, or instead still allow join pushdown in that case? If it is the latter, I think we can do something like my patch upthread does. But that patch needs to be revised to consider custom scans, maybe by storing the restriction clauses also in CustomPath? Thanks Richard
