On 7/12/23 02:43, Jeff Davis wrote:
On Sun, 2023-01-22 at 19:58 +0100, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
(We do have to keep our fingers
crossed that they will decide to use the same RETURNING syntax as we
do
in this patch, of course.)
Do we have a reason to think that they will accept something similar?
We have reason to think that they won't care at all.
There is no RETURNING clause in Standard SQL, and the way they would do
this is:
SELECT ...
FROM OLD TABLE (
MERGE ...
) AS m
The rules for that for MERGE are well defined.
--
Vik Fearing
