On Wed, Aug 16, 2023 at 11:50 PM Michael Paquier <mich...@paquier.xyz> wrote: > >> Do we actually need --no-sync at all if --sync-method is around? We > >> could have an extra --sync-method=none at option level with --no-sync > >> still around mainly for compatibility? Or perhaps that's just > >> over-designing things? > > > > I don't have a strong opinion. We could take up deprecating --no-sync in a > > follow-up thread, though. Like you said, we'll probably need to keep it > > around for backward compatibility, so it might not be worth the trouble. > > Okay, maybe that's not worth it.
Doesn't seem worth it to me. I think --no-sync is more intuitive than --sync-method=none, it's certainly shorter, and it's a pretty important setting because we use it when running the regression tests. -- Robert Haas EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
