Michael Paquier <mich...@paquier.xyz> writes: > On Mon, Jun 04, 2018 at 07:16:33PM -0400, Peter Eisentraut wrote: >> There were some discussions about renaming the existing 2018-09 entry >> versus inserting a new one at -07 and requiring patches to be moved back >> explicitly.
> I would do that to reduce unnecessary log noise, but I was unsure of the > actual status we are at. I am pretty sure that nobody is going to > complain if what they submitted gets looked up two months earlier than > what was previously planned, so I would vote to rename the existing > 2018-09 to 2018-07, to rename the existing 2018-11 to 2018-09, and to > create three new CF entries. +1 for just renaming 2018-09 to 2018-07, if we can do that. We'll end up postponing some entries back to -09, but that seems like less churn than the other way. regards, tom lane