On Mon, Sep 25, 2023 at 1:18 PM Alexander Korotkov <aekorot...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 25, 2023 at 12:58 PM Pavel Borisov <pashkin.e...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > One more doubt about naming. Calling function > > _bt_checkkeys(IndexScanDesc scan, IndexTuple tuple, int tupnatts, > > ScanDirection dir, bool *continuescan, bool requiredMatchedByPrecheck) > > as > > (void) _bt_checkkeys(scan, itup, indnatts, dir, > > &requiredMatchedByPrecheck, false); > > looks little bit misleading because of coincidence of names of 5 and 6 > > arguments. > > I've added the comment clarifying this argument usage. > Fixed typo inficating => indicating as pointed by Pavel. Peter, what do you think about the current shape of the patch? ------ Regards, Alexander Korotkov
0001-Skip-checking-of-scan-keys-required-for-direction-v7.patch
Description: Binary data
