On 2018-Jun-07, David Rowley wrote: > Hi Alvaro, > > Thanks for looking at this. I thought it was strange to pass in both > resultRelInfos. I ended up just making the 2nd param a bool to > indicate of tuple routing was used.
Good call. > I'm personally not really for or against having the function. I agree > that it's slightly weird, but anyway, here's the patch. I'll leave it > up to you to which one you prefer, v3 or v4. Hm I was thinking this new function would be companion to ExecConstrains (a fact I used in the name I proposed,) so it'd be in the same file (probably right after it.) -- Álvaro Herrera https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
