Noah Misch <n...@leadboat.com> writes:
> On Sun, Oct 15, 2023 at 09:58:04PM -0700, Noah Misch wrote:
>> Works for me. I've started a test run with the xlc version change.
> It failed similarly:
> + 23:59:00-07 | 4294966103:4294967295:00+00 | 4294966103:4294967295:00+00
> | 4294966103:4294967295:00+00
> + 23:59:59.99-07 | 4294966103:00:00.01+00 | 4294966103:00:00.01+00
> | 4294966103:00:00.01+00
Ugh. So if the failure is robust enough to persist across
several major xlc versions, why couldn't Thomas reproduce it?
regards, tom lane
