Michael Paquier <mich...@paquier.xyz> writes:
> On Mon, Oct 16, 2023 at 09:54:41AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> I'm mighty tempted though to (a) add coverage for timetz_izone
>> to HEAD, and (b) backpatch the new tests, sans the AT LOCAL case,
>> to the back branches (maybe not v11).
> I see that you've already done (a) with 2f04720307. I'd be curious to
> see what happens for (b), as well, once (a) is processed on hornet
> once..
Sure enough, timetz_izone has exactly the same behavior [1].
I'd kind of decided that back-patching wouldn't be worth the trouble;
do you foresee that it'd teach us anything new?
regards, tom lane
[1]
https://buildfarm.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/show_log.pl?nm=hornet&dt=2023-10-17%2000%3A07%3A36
