Nathan Bossart <nathandboss...@gmail.com> writes:
> On Wed, Nov 01, 2023 at 09:57:18PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> After digging around for a bit, I think part of the problem is a lack
>> of a clearly defined spec for what should happen with NULL string GUCs.
> What if we disallowed NULL string GUCs in v17?
Well, we'd need to devise some other solution for hacks like the
one used by timezone_abbreviations (see comment in
check_timezone_abbreviations). I think it's not worth the trouble,
especially seeing that 95% of guc.c is already set up for this.
The bugs are mostly in newer code like get_explain_guc_options,
and I think that's directly traceable to the lack of any comments
or docs about this behavior.
regards, tom lane
