On 2023-Nov-21, Tom Lane wrote: > Alvaro Herrera <alvhe...@alvh.no-ip.org> writes: > > Right. I made a few more adjustments, including the additional overflow > > check in printTableInit that Tom Lane suggested, and pushed this. > > Committed patch LGTM.
Thanks for looking! > > It's a bit annoying that the error recovery decision of this code is to > > exit the process with an error. [...] > > TBH though, I've never hit that code in real usage. > > Yeah, I think the reason it's stayed like that for 25 years is that > nobody's hit the case in practice. Changing the API would be a bit > troublesome, too, because we don't know if anybody besides psql > uses it. True. -- Álvaro Herrera Breisgau, Deutschland — https://www.EnterpriseDB.com/
