> On 4 Jan 2024, at 07:14, Japin Li <japi...@hotmail.com> wrote: > > Does the timeout is too short for testing? I see the timeouts for lock_timeout > and statement_timeout is more bigger than transaction_timeout.
Makes sense. Done. I've also put some effort into fine-tuning timeouts Nik's case tests. To have 100ms gap between check, false positive and actual bug we had I had to use transaction_timeout = 300ms. Currently all tests take more than 1000ms! But I do not see a way to make these tests both stable and short. Best regards, Andrey Borodin.
v22-0001-Introduce-transaction_timeout.patch
Description: Binary data
v22-0002-Add-tests-for-transaction_timeout.patch
Description: Binary data
v22-0003-Try-to-enable-transaction_timeout-before-next-co.patch
Description: Binary data
v22-0004-fix-reschedule-timeout-for-each-commmand.patch
Description: Binary data
